Oh sweet, can't wait

Thoughts on putting it on Flathub?

Is there anything in specific we should test for?

It also doesn't have a desktop icon or anything like that. It turns out it's fairly hard to create a Flatpak if you cannot build from source. I'm sure I could try doing some crazy symlinking to get things to work but I'm a bit over my head at this point. Here is a paste with the yml I have so far if...

Actually I got it to work using a work around someone else posted. Fonts look terrible but I will look into that later.

Tried to see if I could get started myself building a Flatpak, but apparently the program modifies its own installation directory, which Flatpak does not support. Here is a Reddit thread I made for the issue, someone mentioned using the XDG directory specification: https://old.reddit.com/r/flatpak/c...

Silverblue is a good point. Immutable environments seems to be the direction Fedora is heading in, and I think some others are playing around with it too.

I cannot think of any off the top of my head. I know you can pass CLI arguments to the Flatpak but it's more of a pain than native (have to write the entire name ex: org.videolan.VLC for VLC). Tools like Flatseal make it easy for users to customize what the Flatpak can and cannot access (including f...

I am using Fedora. Using the RPM you provided works fine but personally I just don't like having unmanaged packages I can forget to update installed. As for the repo, I just find using 3rd party repos sketchy in general (even if I know they're trusted) and would prefer a Flatpak to that if I can. I ...

Worked, thank you.

A Flatpak would be a great way to get Filebot to Linux users who do not use Snap. Many users dislike Snap for its proprietary servers. It would also be nice to not need to install another whole sandboxing system just for a single program.

If you attempt to add media using these options on Fedora 35 the program will crash. Dragging the media to the window to add it works perfectly fine.