For Windows 7 Compatible Build I Am Willing To Donate Full Windows Store License Fee To Dev's PayPal Account
Posted: 02 Apr 2017, 16:44
I see at the SourceForge development website there are posted legacy versions of FileBot. I have a large collection of TV Shows, Movies, and Music on several multi-Terabyte network attached storage hard disks that I am importing to a Kodi library, and I need to rename them so that Trakt and TVMb, can identify and name them as they should be in the Kodi library, fanart added as processed into the library, and then catalogued as watched, and rated as I watch them, and FileBot looks like the answer to my prayers. I just hate that I see it appears to be only compatible with Windows 10 in the Microsoft Store. I tried Windows 10 and prefer my Windows 7 still much better. I could have upgraded to Windows 10, but elected not to because of how much I prefer the Windows 7 GUI and features.
If the legacy versions of FileBot will still work with Windows 7, and one of the more seasoned members in this forum may point me to which version I should install that is Windows 7 compatible, I will gladly donate the Microsoft Store license fee to PayPal account of the developer here at FileBot who put in the time to develop this headache cure, I think $20 U.S. is fair to pay to be able to have my TV episodes named with fanart in Kodi media center, and I live on Social Security Disability Income, I really don't understand people from developed countries who are too cheap to pay anything for what they get for very little money (or free) on the internet, compared to what we pay the cable providers and telcos. For the past 15 years I have payed Xfinity (Comcast) $220 a month for internet and television with premium channels [145+ HD since 2012], modem/router ethernet/wifi rental (grew from 1.5Mbps to 200Mbps download speeds), DVR rental (grew from record 3 to watch 1 SD, to record 4 watch 1 1080i HD, to record 5 watch 1 1080p HD), On Demand, and 5 Premium Movie Channels (HBO, Showtime, Starz, Encore, The Movie Chennel, each with their complimentary channels), as well as a VoIP phone that I never used, but bundled with my package to keep the price from going up even further. In forums I frequently read comments from users of apps and services designed to offer what corporations charge a premium for, charging next to nothing or free, and they balk at paying a mere percentage of what they would pay the big monopolies to deliver them a fraction of what they get from developers who deliver content, apps, and services as a hobby pretty much. And these hobbyist developers give us so much more sometimes I think. Especially more control over what and how we get it.
Here's hoping. I will be so grateful to the person who can point me in the right direction. I think it is premature to exclude Windows 7 when so many people are still electing to stay with Windows 7 and 8 operating systems. I for one, was impressed that Windows 7 had the transparencies in the folders, start menu, and task bar views. This was able to be added to many applications I add to my GUI, such as True Launch Bar (desktop shortcut replacement app launcher), WinStep (desktop widget tools with themes and wallpapers, a few transparent themes for Windows 7), even apps we take for granted like Chrome browser and Word have a transparent frame around their interface. I hate that because Microsoft decided that was too resource intensive for a few machines, they did away with it altogether. Transparent theming was very simple to turn off for a more resource conservative white or colors interface, and with a good desktop computer a GPU and RAM modules can be upgraded, as well as the CPU and power supply attached to the mother board. Windows 7 is a great operating system for home or office users who aren't limited to the resources in their laptop or notebook, and are willing to upgrade the power of their machine as their budget allows them to. I believe that Microsoft thinks it's users are too stupid to make choices, and they develop their products each release chain in it's evolution with fewer and fewer choices than the release before it.
Sorry I got off topic, I just hate to be left out of this great looking tool because I am not ready for Windows 10 yet. Is there hope here with Windows 7? I will gladly donate.
If the legacy versions of FileBot will still work with Windows 7, and one of the more seasoned members in this forum may point me to which version I should install that is Windows 7 compatible, I will gladly donate the Microsoft Store license fee to PayPal account of the developer here at FileBot who put in the time to develop this headache cure, I think $20 U.S. is fair to pay to be able to have my TV episodes named with fanart in Kodi media center, and I live on Social Security Disability Income, I really don't understand people from developed countries who are too cheap to pay anything for what they get for very little money (or free) on the internet, compared to what we pay the cable providers and telcos. For the past 15 years I have payed Xfinity (Comcast) $220 a month for internet and television with premium channels [145+ HD since 2012], modem/router ethernet/wifi rental (grew from 1.5Mbps to 200Mbps download speeds), DVR rental (grew from record 3 to watch 1 SD, to record 4 watch 1 1080i HD, to record 5 watch 1 1080p HD), On Demand, and 5 Premium Movie Channels (HBO, Showtime, Starz, Encore, The Movie Chennel, each with their complimentary channels), as well as a VoIP phone that I never used, but bundled with my package to keep the price from going up even further. In forums I frequently read comments from users of apps and services designed to offer what corporations charge a premium for, charging next to nothing or free, and they balk at paying a mere percentage of what they would pay the big monopolies to deliver them a fraction of what they get from developers who deliver content, apps, and services as a hobby pretty much. And these hobbyist developers give us so much more sometimes I think. Especially more control over what and how we get it.
Here's hoping. I will be so grateful to the person who can point me in the right direction. I think it is premature to exclude Windows 7 when so many people are still electing to stay with Windows 7 and 8 operating systems. I for one, was impressed that Windows 7 had the transparencies in the folders, start menu, and task bar views. This was able to be added to many applications I add to my GUI, such as True Launch Bar (desktop shortcut replacement app launcher), WinStep (desktop widget tools with themes and wallpapers, a few transparent themes for Windows 7), even apps we take for granted like Chrome browser and Word have a transparent frame around their interface. I hate that because Microsoft decided that was too resource intensive for a few machines, they did away with it altogether. Transparent theming was very simple to turn off for a more resource conservative white or colors interface, and with a good desktop computer a GPU and RAM modules can be upgraded, as well as the CPU and power supply attached to the mother board. Windows 7 is a great operating system for home or office users who aren't limited to the resources in their laptop or notebook, and are willing to upgrade the power of their machine as their budget allows them to. I believe that Microsoft thinks it's users are too stupid to make choices, and they develop their products each release chain in it's evolution with fewer and fewer choices than the release before it.
Sorry I got off topic, I just hate to be left out of this great looking tool because I am not ready for Windows 10 yet. Is there hope here with Windows 7? I will gladly donate.