Search found 17 matches
- Yesterday, 20:05
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Moving to nfs broke
- Replies: 5
- Views: 380
Re: Moving to nfs broke
I'm setting that folder in my template for that type of media. Might work. I strongly recommend mounting the target file system first though. I could guess that indicators / warnings for overwriting existing files and the like will not work if at format time some target path does not exist ...
- Yesterday, 17:56
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Moving to nfs broke
- Replies: 5
- Views: 380
Re: Moving to nfs broke
I'm moving stuff from a local filesystem to a nfs. I'm setting that folder in my template for that type of media. And that has been working for years at this point. I was not aware, that you could actually proceed without applying :D But in that specific case, it won't help since the filename also ...
- 16 Feb 2026, 13:11
- Forum: Help and Support
- Topic: Moving to nfs broke
- Replies: 5
- Views: 380
Moving to nfs broke
Hey there, the last (or one of the last versions) seems to have broken moving to nfs drives A invalid characters dialogue comes up on rename https://i.imgur.com/SDSiTzb.png https://imgur.com/a/00ZSO4F This usually only happens, if the nfs drive was not mounted on trying to rename. You can access the ...
- 13 Nov 2023, 12:13
- Forum: Ubuntu & Desktop Linux
- Topic: Easy fix if the filebot GUI shows a grey screen and you use the sway window manager (and possibly others)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 17035
- 30 Aug 2022, 17:29
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
If you're maintaining a custom filebot.sh file then you can probably simplify things: * remove sanity checks (flatpak probably takes care of these things) * remove JavaFX module path (not shipped in the flatpak anyway) * FileBot 4.9.5 and higher accept -Dapplication.deployment=flatpak as deployment ...
- 17 Mar 2022, 08:52
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
In general, I've exposed the download, videos and music folders by default for the flathub package.
You can easily add additional paths with a tool like FlatSeal https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.gi ... 4.Flatseal
Usually, if you can get around host or home permissions, you should.
You can easily add additional paths with a tool like FlatSeal https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.gi ... 4.Flatseal
Usually, if you can get around host or home permissions, you should.
- 13 Mar 2022, 03:44
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
- 22 Feb 2022, 17:32
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
Updated to the latest version
- 04 Feb 2022, 11:25
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
I think that can be automated, but probably not worth it 
Let's focus on testing the stable one.
Let's focus on testing the stable one.
- 03 Feb 2022, 18:22
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
Yeah, as long as we don't want to do beta builds on flathub, that's fine, otherwise it might be wiser to use the portable version?
- 02 Feb 2022, 20:52
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
Doesn't seem like there are aur builds in the beta folder :/
- 01 Feb 2022, 18:47
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
Not sure what to test for, but I basically only do renaming with local hdd to smb network drive I'm trying to set it up with zenity now, but I might be missing something, check the code in the repo please This is what happens at runtime: SystemProperty: net.filebot.UserFiles.fileChooser: java.lang ...
- 29 Jan 2022, 19:13
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
I think I've got it to work with the aur package.
Also was able to get rid of some more errors, the javafx thing is still happening, but I'm not sure if that actually breaks something.
Otherwise it needs testing I guess.
Also was able to get rid of some more errors, the javafx thing is still happening, but I'm not sure if that actually breaks something.
Otherwise it needs testing I guess.
- 29 Jan 2022, 12:41
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
The *-portable.tar.xz isn't suitable for "installed" deployment. You'll want to start with *-aur.tar.xz instead and then add patches (i.e. modify filebot.sh to suit the environment) as needed. The error message above means that JavaFX is not in the module path. Yeah, saw you message about that ...
- 29 Jan 2022, 04:27
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
- Replies: 40
- Views: 33843
Re: Feature Request: Flatpak for Linux
I've pushed something here, fixed a few things, the font for e.g. As I couldn't find an official appdata file I had to improvise, so if there is one, I can copy, that would be appreciated https://github.com/razzeee/net.filebot.Filebot There are some problems with filepickers, as it seems like ...
- 27 Aug 2015, 17:30
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Multipart Episodes past episode 50 not working
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2691
Re: Multipart Episodes past episode 50 not working
Thank you, but it seems like there is no build available with that revision yet?
- 26 Aug 2015, 20:41
- Forum: Feature Requests and Bug Reports
- Topic: Multipart Episodes past episode 50 not working
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2691
Multipart Episodes past episode 50 not working
Hey everybody, multipart episodes are really a pain to rename. I already have to go and add the episode numbers by hand. But for some reason it seems like number 50 is magically and everything after that stops working for me. Animaniacs (1993) Animaniacs Season 1 (1993-1994) 1x50-51 - Guardin' the ...