InvalidPathException: Illegal char <:> at index

Any questions? Need some help?
Post Reply
efes
Posts: 1
Joined: 02 Jun 2016, 15:40

InvalidPathException: Illegal char <:> at index

Post by efes »

SEO ist eine komplizierte Disziplin. Hinzu kommt die Tatsache, dass Google seinen Algorithmus häufig aktualisiert , wodurch Ranking Verschiebungen resultieren.

Darüber hinaus veröffentlicht Google oft neue Technologien. Das macht das Leben von SEOs und SEO & Suchmaschinenoptimierung Agenturen noch komplizierter, da sie eine Lernkurve zu überwinden haben, um richtig ihre Kunden zu bedienen.

<strong>Eines Tages könnte es einfacher sein, ein Arzt zu werden, als ein SEO - Scherz! (Aber nicht wirklich… )</strong>

Schon jetzt gibt es aber eine Menge von Fehlinformationen (und fehlende Informationen) über das, was es braucht, um eine Seite in den organischen Suchergebnissen zu ordnen.
Last edited by efes on 29 Jul 2016, 20:09, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
rednoah
The Source
Posts: 23953
Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
Location: Taipei
Contact:

Re: Issue \system32

Post by rednoah »

1.
/E:/Media is definitely no good. Where did you learn that? It's like an unholy union of Unix and Windows paths... First letter has to be [a-z] and the second has to be [:] and that's just how it is on Windows. :lol:

2.
Are you sure you know what the /k switch is doing? Maybe it's fine. IDK. Just haven't seen anyone doing it that way.



PS: You've probably corrupted your exclude list file by opening it with notepad and saving it with BOM. The exclude list file must be UTF-8 without BOM, and only Microsoft programs (notepad, wordpad, etc) fck with that (use proper editors like notepad++ or sublime instead) or just don't mess with the exclude list. ;)



PS2: Invalid exclude list possibly caused by running multiple filebot/amc script instances at the same time without specifying a log file (with log lock) which is what would normally guarantee that there's only one active instance.
:idea: Please read the FAQ and How to Request Help.
Post Reply