[DEB] Debian package
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Maybe just a temporary issue of some kind? The repository files are all there as far as I can see, and fetch works for the URLs that seem to have an issue in your log:
https://get.filebot.net/deb/dists/
https://get.filebot.net/deb/dists/
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 18:36
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Just curious, will you put an arm package in the Deb repo? Would make upgrading much easier.
Thanks!
Thanks!
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Yes, there will be a noarch package:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9535
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9535
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 09 Jun 2014, 10:41
Re: [DEB] Debian package
the apt repo is still broken
tested on debian stretch and buster, nothing works.
Failed > deb https://get.filebot.net/deb/ universal main
Failed > deb [arch=amd64] https://get.filebot.net/deb/ stable main
they key is installed
Code: Select all
W: GPG error: https://get.filebot.net/deb universal Release: Detached signature file '/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/get.filebot.net_deb_dists_universal_Release.gpg' is in unsupported binary format
Failed > deb https://get.filebot.net/deb/ universal main
Failed > deb [arch=amd64] https://get.filebot.net/deb/ stable main
they key is installed
Code: Select all
[email protected]:/etc/apt# apt-key adv --fetch-keys https://get.filebot.net/filebot/KEYS
Executing: /tmp/apt-key-gpghome.3sjEk5Kz9e/gpg.1.sh --fetch-keys https://get.filebot.net/filebot/KEYS
gpg: requesting key from 'https://get.filebot.net/filebot/KEYS'
gpg: key 4E402EBF7C3C6A71: 4 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key 4E402EBF7C3C6A71: "Reinhard Pointner <[email protected]>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: unchanged: 1
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Works for me:
Tested on Ubuntu. Not sure if there's something significantly different on Debian.
EDIT:
There seems to be a recent change that requires ascii-armoured signature files.
Code: Select all
Hit:4 https://get.filebot.net/deb stable Release
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
EDIT:
There seems to be a recent change that requires ascii-armoured signature files.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 19:15
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Hello Reinhard,
I am currently on...
...what's my best option for upgrading to 4.8.5 and Java 11?
Thanks,
Paully
I am currently on...
Code: Select all
FileBot 4.8.2 (r5789)
JNA Native: 5.2.2
MediaInfo: 18.05
7-Zip-JBinding: 9.20
Chromaprint: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "fpcalc": error=2, No such file or directory
Extended Attributes: OK
Unicode Filesystem: OK
Script Bundle: 2019-02-26 (r552)
Groovy: 2.5.1
JRE: OpenJDK Runtime Environment 1.8.0_222
JVM: 64-bit OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
CPU/MEM: 4 Core / 3 GB Max Memory / 18 MB Used Memory
OS: Linux (amd64) Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS
HW: Linux nas 4.15.0-15-generic #16~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 5 12:19:23 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
DATA: /home/paully/Downloads/filebot/data/paully
Package: TAR
License: FileBot License P8xxxxx3 (Valid-Until: 2020-07-31)
------------------- UPDATE AVAILABLE: FileBot 4.8.5 (r6224) --------------------
Done ヾ(@⌒ー⌒@)ノ
Thanks,
Paully
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Have you tried this yet?rednoah wrote: ↑13 Jul 2018, 12:00The installer/deb.sh will add the repository and install FileBot for you:Code: Select all
bash -xu <<< "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/filebot/plugins/master/installer/deb.sh)"

-
- Donor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 18 Nov 2016, 08:34
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Hello everyone, I have a quick question : I'm using Filebot on a Ubuntu headless server (16.04) and the 4.7.9 was working fine with openjdk-8-jre-headless. The latest .deb (4.8.5) required though the full openjdk-8-jre and pulled over 200MB of libs.
Is there any good reason behind it or is it just a package error?
Regards
Is there any good reason behind it or is it just a package error?
Regards
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
libjna is the only required package dependency:
The deb.sh installer script will however install all recommended dependencies, to make sure everything works out of the box regardless of your specific use case:
Code: Select all
Depends: libjna-java
Recommends: default-jre, openjfx, mediainfo, libchromaprint-tools, p7zip-full, unrar | unrar-free
Enhances: nautilus-actions
The deb.sh installer script will however install all recommended dependencies, to make sure everything works out of the box regardless of your specific use case:
Code: Select all
sudo apt-get install --install-recommends -y filebot
-
- Donor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 18 Nov 2016, 08:34
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Hmm that's strange, I swear the openjdk-jre8 (and the libs) were listed as a dependency... Any possible mistake on my side?
PS : I didn't use any script, just downloaded the .deb and dpkg -i
PPS : the libjna is the problem, it recommends the default-jre (but not headless)
PS : I didn't use any script, just downloaded the .deb and dpkg -i
PPS : the libjna is the problem, it recommends the default-jre (but not headless)
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
You should be able to install everything like so:
That should only install the lib-jna and filebot packages with bare minimum dependencies.
Code: Select all
sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends -y filebot
-
- Donor
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 18 Nov 2016, 08:34
Re: [DEB] Debian package
So I gave the repo a try, but failed :
Hmmm looks like it worked. Next step, add the repo and apt update :
Looks like I have a problem with the signature. What did I do wrong?
Regards
Code: Select all
[email protected]:~# apt-key adv --fetch-keys "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/filebot/plugins/master/gpg/maintainer.pub"
Executing: /tmp/tmp.kuHJZvQopu/gpg.1.sh --fetch-keys
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/filebot/plugins/master/gpg/maintainer.pub
gpgkeys: protocol `https' not supported
gpg: no handler for keyserver scheme `https'
gpg: WARNING: unable to fetch URI https://raw.githubusercontent.com/filebot/plugins/master/gpg/maintainer.pub: keyserver error
Code: Select all
[email protected]:~# wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/filebot/plugins/master/gpg/maintainer.pub
--2019-11-23 02:03:01-- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/filebot/plugins/master/gpg/maintainer.pub
Resolving raw.githubusercontent.com (raw.githubusercontent.com)... 151.101.36.133
Connecting to raw.githubusercontent.com (raw.githubusercontent.com)|151.101.36.133|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 4650 (4.5K) [text/plain]
Saving to: ‘maintainer.pub’
maintainer.pub 100%[===============================>] 4.54K --.-KB/s in 0s
2019-11-23 02:03:01 (17.9 MB/s) - ‘maintainer.pub’ saved [4650/4650]
[email protected]:~# apt-key adv maintainer.pub
Executing: /tmp/tmp.5dmHdLUYIf/gpg.1.sh maintainer.pub
pub 4096R/7C3C6A71 2017-04-13 Reinhard Pointner <[email protected]>
Hmmm looks like it worked. Next step, add the repo and apt update :
Code: Select all
[email protected]:~# apt update
Ign:9 https://get.filebot.net/deb universal-jdk8 InRelease
Get:10 https://get.filebot.net/deb universal-jdk8 Release [1,165 B]
Get:11 https://get.filebot.net/deb universal-jdk8 Release.gpg [862 B]
Ign:11 https://get.filebot.net/deb universal-jdk8 Release.gpg
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: https://get.filebot.net/deb universal-jdk8 Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 4E402EBF7C3C6A71
E: The repository 'https://get.filebot.net/deb universal-jdk8 Release' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
Regards
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
1.
What version of Ubuntu are you using?
2.
Did you use the install script which pre-installs the necessary dependencies, such as gnupg-curl?
https://github.com/filebot/plugins/blob ... deb.sh#L13
What version of Ubuntu are you using?
2.
Did you use the install script which pre-installs the necessary dependencies, such as gnupg-curl?
https://github.com/filebot/plugins/blob ... deb.sh#L13
Code: Select all
bash -xu <<< "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/filebot/plugins/master/installer/deb.sh)"
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 19:15
Re: [DEB] Debian package
I am currently on FileBot 4.8.2 using the .deb package by hand (a long time ago.)
I've just seen this latest post and out of interest I went through the github script step-by-step with the --simulate option to see what would happen, because this is a headless server with no gui needed.
All was going well but then the last command WAS going to pull in 90 packages which I really don't need
So, I changed the install command line to...
...which was a little better at 45 packages, but those were still loads of X Server related packages.
Is there any way to stop it installing ANY of those?

Thanks,
Paully
I've just seen this latest post and out of interest I went through the github script step-by-step with the --simulate option to see what would happen, because this is a headless server with no gui needed.
All was going well but then the last command WAS going to pull in 90 packages which I really don't need

Code: Select all
sudo apt-get --simulate install --install-recommends filebot
Code: Select all
sudo apt-get --simulate install --no-install-recommends filebot
Is there any way to stop it installing ANY of those?

Thanks,
Paully
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
You can always use the portable and then figure out dependencies manually if disk space is an issue:
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6057
That being said, according to the package metadata, libjna-java is the only hard dependency, and everything else is optional:
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6057
That being said, according to the package metadata, libjna-java is the only hard dependency, and everything else is optional:
Code: Select all
Depends: libjna-java
Recommends: default-jre, openjfx, mediainfo, libchromaprint-tools, p7zip-full, unrar | unrar-free
Enhances: nautilus-actions
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 19:15
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Space is not a problem, I'm just trying to keep my system lean and mean with as few packages as possible installed and needing to be updated 
OK, so the Beta 4.9.0 is an option with just that 1 dependency, and it seems to only install 2 packages when I simulate...
...so are you saying that if I install the Beta 4.9.0 deb package, without the 75 recommended packages, my server will not start trying to install them at a later date?
Is there a way to test that?
I guess I could press CTRL+C if it kicks off
Regards,
Paully

OK, so the Beta 4.9.0 is an option with just that 1 dependency, and it seems to only install 2 packages when I simulate...
Code: Select all
$ sudo apt-get --simulate install libjna-java
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following additional packages will be installed:
libjna-jni
Suggested packages:
libjna-java-doc
The following NEW packages will be installed
libjna-java libjna-jni
0 to upgrade, 2 to newly install, 0 to remove and 4 not to upgrade.
Inst libjna-jni (4.2.2-1 Ubuntu:16.04/xenial [amd64])
Inst libjna-java (4.2.2-1 Ubuntu:16.04/xenial [all])
Conf libjna-jni (4.2.2-1 Ubuntu:16.04/xenial [amd64])
Conf libjna-java (4.2.2-1 Ubuntu:16.04/xenial [all])
Is there a way to test that?
I guess I could press CTRL+C if it kicks off

Regards,
Paully
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 19:15
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Also, is it best to remove 4.8.2 before I install the Beta 4.9.0 for cleanliness?
- rednoah
- The Source
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 08:59
- Location: Taipei
- Contact:
Re: [DEB] Debian package
IDK. If you don't want surprised, then you can just not use the apt repository and manage things manually. Regardless, new version will override the old version, apt takes care of that, so no need to worry about cleanliness.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 19:15
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Ooooo, this could be the winning command line, which only installs 3 packages!
...will filebot work without all the recommended packages?!
Also, I am only running OpenJDK Java v8...
Am I good to go?!

Paully
Code: Select all
$ sudo apt -s --no-install-recommends install /home/paully/Downloads/filebot/FileBot_4.9.0_universal-jdk8.deb
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting 'filebot' instead of '/home/paully/Downloads/filebot/FileBot_4.9.0_universal-jdk8.deb'
The following additional packages will be installed:
libjna-java libjna-jni
Suggested packages:
libjna-java-doc
Recommended packages:
openjdk-8-jre openjfx libchromaprint-tools p7zip-full unrar | unrar-free
The following NEW packages will be installed
filebot libjna-java libjna-jni
0 to upgrade, 3 to newly install, 0 to remove and 6 not to upgrade.
Inst libjna-jni (4.2.2-1 Ubuntu:16.04/xenial [amd64])
Inst libjna-java (4.2.2-1 Ubuntu:16.04/xenial [all])
Inst filebot (4.9.0 local-deb [all])
Conf libjna-jni (4.2.2-1 Ubuntu:16.04/xenial [amd64])
Conf libjna-java (4.2.2-1 Ubuntu:16.04/xenial [all])
Conf filebot (4.9.0 local-deb [all])
Also, I am only running OpenJDK Java v8...
Code: Select all
openjdk version "1.8.0_222"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~16.04.1-b10)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.222-b10, mixed mode)

Paully
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 19:15
Re: [DEB] Debian package
OK, so I went for it.
Turns out my current filebot was just a symlink to the TAR version, which made things easier.
Here are my upgrade / install commands as root...
So, I now have this...
...cannot wait to try it out!
Fingers crossed!
Thanks!
Regards,
Paully
Turns out my current filebot was just a symlink to the TAR version, which made things easier.
Here are my upgrade / install commands as root...
Code: Select all
$ apt install p7zip-full unrar
$ apt --no-install-recommends install FileBot_4.9.0_universal-jdk8.deb
Code: Select all
$ filebot -script fn:sysinfo
FileBot 4.9.0 (r6899)
JNA Native: 4.0.1
MediaInfo: 19.09
p7zip: p7zip Version 9.20 (locale=en_GB.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,4 CPUs)
unrar: UNRAR 5.30 beta 2 freeware
Chromaprint: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "fpcalc": error=2, No such file or directory
Extended Attributes: OK
Unicode Filesystem: OK
Script Bundle: 2019-11-16 (r603)
Groovy: 2.5.8
JRE: OpenJDK Runtime Environment 1.8.0_222
JVM: 64-bit OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
CPU/MEM: 4 Core / 3.7 GB Max Memory / 33 MB Used Memory
OS: Linux (amd64)
HW: Linux nas 4.15.0-15-generic #16~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 5 12:19:23 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
STORAGE: ext4 [/] @ 106 GB | fuse.sshfs [/home/paully/Downloads/seedbox2] @ 990 GB
DATA: /home/paully/.filebot
Package: DEB
License: FileBot License xxxxxxxx (Valid-Until: 2020-07-31)
Done ヾ(@⌒ー⌒@)ノ
Fingers crossed!
Thanks!
Regards,
Paully
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 09 Mar 2014, 19:15
Re: [DEB] Debian package
Yep, all good 
With 4.9.0 the process seems to be faster and better at matching titles.
Thanks for your help and keep up the great work on this time-saving gem.
Paully

With 4.9.0 the process seems to be faster and better at matching titles.
Thanks for your help and keep up the great work on this time-saving gem.
Paully